Selected (but representative) quotes regarding 
the latest NMFS survey sampling snafu



Link to fisheries survey information
Follow this link to other background 
information on fisheries research:
Link to Captain Jim Lovgren's
report on the NMFS 
net "Calibration" survey



Note that, because newspapers allow (or don't) access to previously published articles in a variety of ways, the links below are to each paper's home page. From there you will have to manuever to the source article.


First, federal fisheries management in New England appears ready to embark on a cultural upheaval in its fisheries and fishing communities. The upheaval is not just about rebuilding, but involves a drive for more production with less equipment. If you talk to a fisheries scientist, you will be told that we need fewer boats if there are fewer fish (so the fish can rebuild). And you will be told that we need fewer boats when there are more fish (because catch rates will skyrocket). Bad news, either way, for the current composition of fishermen and their communities. And, in the mid to long-run, it's not going to matter if you are a New Bedford scalloper or a Portland or Gloucester groundfisherman.
Upheaval may make some academic sense, but small businesses and the social fabric of fishing communities built since the Pilgrims are what is at stake in New England. It is hard to unravel four centuries of fishing tradition that admittedly did not develop in an integrated way.

From a presentation by David Frulla presented at Fish Expo/Workboat Atlantic 2002
Providence, RI
10/04/02

Teri Frady, a spokeswoman for the National Marine Fisheries Agency, said the agency has been using faulty gear in surveys taken since the winter of 2000. But she said government scientists don't yet know what the precise impact has been on fish surveys. She said the federal court has been notified of the problem and new surveys will be taken, but the court decision ordering the cutback of the fishing fleet still stands. Frady doubted the new surveys will show much difference from the trends of surveys taken since 1940. They have consistently shown that overfishing has cut back on the fish population, and although the stock has been rebuilding in recent years, some new efforts will be required to allow the fish to recover fully. "There's no question that the condition of the (fish) stock is such that everybody can't stay in business," Frady said. "There's too much capacity out there to catch fish."

The future of Gloucester, Mass., hanging in the balance
Scripps Howard News Service
10/11/02

“When fishermen’s livelihoods depend on the quality of survey data, we owe it to them to get the data collection right,” said (Maine) Senator (Susan) Collins.  “There is no room for second rate science.... The type of data necessary to develop fisheries management plans can be produced only after years of research that demonstrate long-term stock trends,” said Senator Collins. “Theoretical modeling of past data of questionable quality is simply not good enough to develop the regulations of a plan that will affect the survival of our fishermen.”
 

Senator Susan Collins introduces legislation to freeze further restrictions on ground fishing pending further study
Press Release
10/11/02

At the 12 foot setback the results would have to be considered catastrophic. The  slacked back wing was at a right angle to the  other wing creating an L shape as the net towed through the bottom. The twine on the slacked back wing was bowed in the half tunnel effect, and probably was now more of a gill net then a trawl net. Bottom contact  was severely  impacted on this wing and could be described as minimal .  Major plowing was taking place to the rollers and the cookies on the stable, leading wing. The folds and distortion of  twine on this wing increased even further. Only the dumbest [or unluckiest] fish in the ocean would be caught by a net this distorted.

Observations from the Albatross IV  correctional cruise
Captain Jim  Lovgren
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council
09/30/02
(Full report linked above)


Prior to departure (on the NOAA survey "calibration" cruise), fishermen examined the net and observed:

    The “cans” on the net displayed atypical flat spots from wear.  This suggested that the cans were being trapped under the footrope, which would cause the net to work improperly.  (This was later confirmed through observation when the net was actually deployed.  The Albatross crew was unaware of this “snarl” but was alerted to the problem by the fishermen aboard.)
    The doors, which play a critical role in keeping the net evenly spread, display an obvious difference in wear indicating that one door is spreading more than the other.  Also, the “backstrap” on the doors showed improper twists in the chain.

Problems with the groundfish survey
M. Raymond
Associated Fisheries of Maine
10/01/02
http://www.fishingnj.org/trawlmessindview.html




     Fishermen who witnessed tests aboard the government research vessel Albatross IV last week say miscalibrated warp lines left its fishing net deployed ineffectively, bolstering the industry's argument that government groundfish surveys may have underestimated stocks over the last two years.
     "It was no surprise for me in any way, shape or form, or any other fisherman out there," said Stephen Lee, a fishermen from Berwick, Maine, one of several fishing industry observers who took part in the special trawl observation cruise. "It definitely shows there is a problem."
Fishermen say tests show flawed process
J. Stewardson
(New Bedford) Standard-Times
10/01/02
(http://www.s-t.com/)

     Tests at sea of fish-counting equipment last week show that federal biologists have significantly underestimated the number of cod and other fish off the New England coast, according to three fishermen who witnessed the research. 
The National Marine Fisheries Service conducted four days of experiments with net trawls in southern New England waters in response to complaints that they were hauling the nets unevenly while surveying the health of fish populations. 
     ''There's plenty wrong. The net set was totally different from what it should have been. It was a disaster,'' said Stephen Lee, a fisherman from Berwick, Maine, who accompanied more than a dozen other observers and scientists on a four-day voyage that returned to port at 7 a.m. Friday. 
     Because the results of the tests are not scheduled to be publicized until a workshop next week, officials at the National Marine Fisheries Service were more guarded in their remarks.
Test said to show fish undercount 
D. Arnold
Boston Globe
09/29/02
( http://www.boston.com/globe/)

     The fact that errors were made in the collection of data is not what is unacceptable. What is intolerable is the disregard of the data presented by the fishermen, whose motivation was not greed, but the insistence that the regulatory process be based on accurate data.
     It could even be said the fishing industry could have and attempted to provide the "best available science." We must always remember this when we make a mistake in rigging our fishing gear, yet the only people affected are us; but when the agency in charge of collecting data makes the same mistake, it affects all aspects of the fishing industry.
     Also, another thing we need to be aware of is that environmental groups such as Oceana, the Conservation Law Foundation and the American Oceans Campaign are using unreliable data to initiate lawsuits, making fisheries' managers submit to their agenda. In other words, these environment groups are using the fishing industry as a marketing tool to promote their own existence. They should be held accountable for their actions as well.
For too long, fishermen's expertise discarded by feds
New Bedford Standard Times Editorial
9/28/02
(http://www.s-t.com/)

     With underwater video cameras attached to the vessel's nets, the fishermen and scientists watched as the nets were let out with even cables and then again with mismatched cables. The experiment was repeated with cable mismatched as little as two feet and as much as 12 feet to mirror the range of mismatch the feds discovered. 
But even at 2 feet, Odlin said, the video showed the nets were lifting off the ocean floor - a critical point because the research vessel is supposed to be measuring the amount and health of groundfish that swim near the bottom, such as cod and haddock. 
     "When you lose bottom contact, a lot of the species we try to catch dive underneath the net and you don't catch them,'' said Odlin, a trawler with 30 years of commercial groundfishing experience. 
With a 12-foot mismatch, the video showed the net, which is supposed to be shaped like a "V" underwater crumpled to look like an "L," meaning half of it was closed. Fishermen aboard the Albatross said they could see the fish swimming underneath and escaping. 
Fishermen: Test shows feds' data flawed 
K. Lazar
Boston Herald
09/28/02
(http://www.bostonherald.com/)

     (Massachusetts Congressman John) Tierney stressed the need for observers on fishing boats and for independent, scientific peer review of the government's research methods and data. 
     And he insisted that fishermen need to play a central role in gathering information about the state of groundfish stocks. 
     "We are fighting to make sure your knowledge and experience as harvesters is respected and valued," he said. "It's knowledge that should and has to be taken into consideration by our regulatory councils and by the legislative colleagues Barney and I work with." 
     (Massachusetts Congressman Barney) Frank, who represents the port of New Bedford, not only called for a delay in Amendment 13, but also suggested the problem with the Albatross threatened the concept of government regulation. 
     "If our rules are going to work, they have to be seen as fair," he said.
     Frank described how members of Congress are often asked to arbitrate difficult issues based on complex studies and information. 
     "But the notion that a net needs to be equal on both sides ... it doesn't take a genius to figure out that's wrong," he said.
     Frank called the fishing industry one of the most regulated work environments in the world, but added that fishermen accept restrictions as long as the rules are fair and rational. 
'Hold off'; Frank says regulators should delay new rules
B. Taormina
Gloucester Times
09/23/02
(http://www.gloucestertimes.com/main.htm)

     Those who work in the billion-dollar New England fishing industry - especially the 1,400 boat owners who catch cod, haddock and flounder - are holding their breath and their tempers, as scientists try to figure out how much the improperly rigged net may have skewed fish population data. Information from these surveys has been a driving force behind increasingly strict fishing regulations. 
     "This shows how critical it is to know what you're doing out there," said Jim Kendall of the Trawler Survival Fund, an industry-funded fishermen's association, representing fish draggers and scallopers. Kendall is also a New England Fishery Management Council member. 
     "When we make a mistake, it only affects us, but when something like the Albatross goes out and messes up, that affects the livelihood of everyone in the industry," Kendall said. 
Fishermen await new net results 
Scientists will try to save 21/2 years of population data in research cruise next month.
D. Fraser
Cape Cod Times
09/19/02
(http://www.capecodonline.com/)

     (Gloucester Mayor John) Bell and other members of the Gloucester coalition were encouraged by a letter sent by members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Donald Evans this week, calling for a task force to investigate the gear used and the data collected during the fishery surveys. 
     The letter was signed by Senators John Kerry and Edward Kennedy and Congressmen John Tierney, Barney Frank and William Delahunt. 
     It suggested that Amendment 13, a restrictive groundfish management plan that has been in the works for the past several years, should be delayed if the questions about the fishery surveys are not resolved.

Official promises open door; Solons weigh in on fish survey flaw
B. Taormina
Gloucester Daily Times
09/19/02
(http://www.gloucestertimes.com/main.htm)

     The trawl cables used to deploy the vessel's fishing net were improperly marked and the miscalibration may have led to the net not being properly aligned while being towed in the water.
     "This issue is a substantial concern in the Bay State, where management decisions made in reliance upon these assessments directly affect the livelihoods of thousands of fishing families, as well as our ability to ensure the long-term sustainability of the stocks upon which these coastal communities depend," the Massachusetts delegation (Sens. John F. Kerry and Edward M. Kennedy, and Reps. Barney Frank, William Delahunt and John F. Tierney) noted.
     The legislators also called upon the NMFS to establish a Northeast science task force to include state and regional management experts, as well as leading scientific and gear experts, including fishermen, to address the gear issues.

Lawmakers lobby for fishermen, Cite improperly rigged gear as cause for concern 
By J. Stewardson
New Bedford Standard-Times
09/19/02
(http://www.s-t.com/)

     Every boat in the country that is used to conduct fish counts for the National Marine Fisheries Service will undergo a detailed equipment check due to a disclosure that a New England-based boat had faulty equipment that may have resulted in undercounted fish populations for the last two years, a top federal oceans' official said yesterday. 
     Meanwhile, Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry and several US House members from Massachusetts suggested that regulators may need to delay strict new fishing regulations until they are certain of the seriousness of the counting errors. They want an independent panel that would include fishermen, regulators, and scientists to review the mistake, which some fishermen are calling ''trawlgate.'' 
     "We need to restore public confidence," said Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., undersecretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere at a meeting with Globe editors yesterday. He said his agency, which includes the National Marine Fisheries Service, will insist on detailed procedures to prevent future errors. 

Fish survey boat checks expanded
B. Daley
Boston Globe
09/18/02
( http://www.boston.com/globe/)

     The state's fishing czar is calling for an independent task force to review federal research after the feds this week admitted to a major snafu in the way they collect key data that governs the entire New England fishing industry.
     "I think it would be beneficial for a specially assigned science task force to review current and past fishery information that we are using to make management decisions on," Paul Diodati, director of the state's Division of Marine Fisheries, said yesterday. Diodati said the head of the National Marine Fisheries Service has agreed to come to Boston in early October to discuss creating the task force, which Diodati said should include fishermen and other experts from New England states.
     "For the past several years we have been witnessing and receiving anecdotal information from the fishing industry that their catches are much larger than (the feds) are observing in their trawl surveys," Diodati said.

Fed Data Collection Flaw May Have Spawned Fish Story
K. Lazar
Boston Herald
09/16/02
(http://www.bostonherald.com/)

     "It doesn't surprise me. It really doesn't," said Peter Inniss, a Portland fishing boat captain. "The numbers are far from true. They always have been. They're always a lot smaller than they should be."
     Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, sent a letter to the agency's director demanding an explanation and steps to restore trust in its research. Snowe is a member of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere and Fisheries, which oversees the agency.
     "I am astonished and frustrated that NMFS would permit an error of this magnitude," Snowe said in a written statement Wednesday. "This blunder represents a real step backward in fisheries management."

Gear flaw could alter new rules for fishing
J. Richardson
Portland (ME) Press Herald
09/12/02
(http://www.pressherald.com/)

     Gloucester fisherman Bill Brown was not surprised by the mistake. But then again, he doesn’t consider any government surveys reliable, and like many fishermen, has long contended that flawed science doesn’t reflect the improving health of fish stocks.
     "The whole thing is absurd," he said. "This is the type of thing that’s determining our livelihood."

Fishing data may be inaccurate because of faulty studies
J. Lindsay
Associated Press (from Foster's Sunday Citizen)
09/12/02
(http://www4.fosters.com/index.asp)

     Fisherman Hank Lackner knows firsthand about the problems with fisheries science. 
     Two years ago, Lackner, a resident of Montauk, N.Y., conducted two side-by-side, bottom trawl surveys with the National Marine Fisheries research boat, the Albatross. 
     Trawl surveys, samples of fish collected each year in the spring and fall, are used to gauge the health and abundance of groundfish such as cod and haddock. That information is then used to craft fishing regulations. 
     Lackner's boat, the Jason and Danielle, caught 13 times more fish than the Albatross, according to the fisheries service's final report on the comparative tests. 
     Others say the difference was even more dramatic, with the Jason and Danielle catching 20 fish for every one the Albatross hauled back. 
     When the results were tallied, researchers decided to stop the tests. 
     "We wanted to do more side-by-side surveys, but they told us we weren't allowed to do it any more," said Lackner who was in Gloucester yesterday to take out fish at the Seafood Display Auction

Fishermen find vindication
B. Taormina
Gloucester Daily Times
09/13/02
(http://www.gloucestertimes.com/main.htm)

      "This is a tremendous error," said Gloucester resident Vito Calomo who serves as the executive director of the Massachusetts Fisheries Recovery Commission. "It's like taking a door and closing it more than half way and trying to let a 300-pound Vito Calomo walk through it." 
     Other fishermen and council members were stunned that researchers did not check their gear before conducting the surveys. 
     "It didn't ever cross my mind that something so basic wasn't checked before the surveys," said Barbara Stevenson, a council member from Maine. 
      "I assumed scientists went through some reasonable process," she said. "I'm flabbergasted."

Fish data flawed; Scientists admit use of improper gear
B. Taormina
Gloucester Daily Times
09/12/02
(http://www.gloucestertimes.com/main.htm)

     The mistake was initially spotted by Cape Cod fisherman Matt Stommel, who saw the boat's cables being calibrated on a wharf in February 2000. Instead of marking various lengths on the two cables as they lay side by side, a contractor marked them separately and incorrectly. 
     Yesterday, Stommel said he first told regulators about the problem two years ago, but nothing was done. Frustrated last February, he asked federal regulators to check the wire before their important spring survey began, but they said there was not enough money. Stommel says he offered to pay the cost himself, but regulators said the cable was fine and they would check it in June. 
     ''They had the opportunity to [look at this] before,'' said Stommel, who said he wanted the judge to be informed of any errors before she issued new fishing rules this past spring. ''This problem could have been discovered.''

Fish counts in region questioned
B. Daley & G. Cook
Boston Globe
09/12/02
(http://www.boston.com/globe/)


     Conservation Law Foundation fishery scientist Anthony Chatwin also agreed that increased participation of fishermen could result. But he said the mistakes should not be looked upon as an excuse to shelve efforts to restore fish stocks. He said that regardless of the stock assessment, fishermen were still catching far too many fish. 
     "CLF continues to have great confidence in New England's federal fishery scientists and knows that NMFS will act quickly to determine the impacts of their error and make adjustments as necessary," Chatwin stated in a press release yesterday. 
     He said he did not think that the error would have any impact on a timeline to have new, stricter regulations in place by next August.
Fishermen demand voice
D. Fraser
Cape Cod Times
(http://www.capecodonline.com/)

     "A little difference and the net will tow at an angle. You'll catch some fish, but not as many," said Bob Lane of Falmouth, who owns two New Bedford fish draggers. Lane's crews check the warp lines every other trip to make sure they are still equal in length and that the marks line up. 
     (NMFS spokesperson Teri) Frady said the Albatross crew did check line lengths with a readout from an automated counter. She said they also depended on bottom sensors on the net. 
      Lane countered that both automated systems take a back seat in his mind to a visual inspection of the gear, laying the thousand meter lines out side by side on the dock.

Flaws cited in fishing stock data collection
D. Fraser
Cape Cod Times
(http://www.capecodonline.com/)

     "I was actually shocked but wasn't surprised," said Robert Lane, owner of the trawler Isabel S and a board member of the Trawler Survival Fund, an industry group formed to protect the interests of the groundfish industry.
      "All these years, fishermen have been going to the council and groundfish meetings, saying there's more fish out there than Woods Hole tells us," he added. "And now when something like this comes out, people realize we were right and they were wrong."
      "It's frustrating when our fishermen go out and we see how much they're landing and their scientists go out and they can't find fish," said Erik Orman, president of Tempest Fisheries, who is also a board member of the Trawler Survival Fund.
      "A lot of thought process goes into fishing," he added. "Someone doing it wrong leads to bad trips for our fishermen or bad science on their end."

Rigging foul-up could mean flawed fishing data
J. Stewardson
New Bedford Standard-Times
(http://www.s-t.com/)


     "It's amazing that something as basic as checking the length of the trawl wires could be overlooked...but it's criminal that the condition of the trawl gear was ignored for nearly two years after the Science Center had been alerted to the problem by a concerned fisherman.  If that fishermen had not persisted, this fiasco would never have been brought to light."
Maggie Raymond
Groundfish Group
Associated Fisheries of Maine

     One can almost picture a crew of scientists in white lab coats fumbling with their fishing gear, coming up with bad catch and refusing to throw it back. Gloucester Mayor John Bell says fisheries regulators have inspired "a culture of mediocrity" -- this from a patient man, who has encouraged local fishermen to measure their invective and try to work with the system, rather than against it. 

Holes found in survey
Editorial
Glocester Daily Times
09/16/02
(http://www.gloucestertimes.com/main.htm)


     What a relief it must have been for hundreds of commercial fishermen in New Bedford and throughout New England this week when scientists at the National Marine Fisheries Service in Woods Hole announced that their data for the last two years was flawed. 
      Big time oops! 
      There's nothing as satisfying as learning that you aren't crazy after wondering whether you are. 
      Many of our region's fishermen must have thought they were going crazy as they pulled up increasing numbers of groundfish in the last two years, but were told by scientists that many groundfish species were not recovering from decades of overfishing. 
NMFS has yet another reason for cooperation
New Bedford Standard Times
Editorial
09/16/02
(http://www.s-t.com/)


     One of the problems with management as it stands is that the results of our VPAs (virtual population analyses) are taken as flat-out gospel. Indeed, folks at the Conservation Law Foundation and all the other groups bent on making a living by bashing fishermen sling these figures around as if they were an absolute, positive fact. They are not. These "random" fish tows never reflect any biological knowledge, and the result is a number of fatal flaws.
Feds' fish census methods flawed
M. Benjamin
Cape Cod Times
09/15/02
(http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/)