February 3, 2005
     
    Mr. David Bernhart, Chief
    Office of Protected Resources Division
    Southeast Region
    NOAA/NMFS  
    9721 Executive Center Drive North
    St. Petersburg, FL  33702-2432
    via facsimile (727.570.5517)
     
     
    RE:  Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan, 69 FR 65127.
     
    Dear Mr. Bernhart:
     
    Please accept these comments on the Proposed Rule for the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BNDTRP) on behalf of the Garden State Seafood Association (GSSA)(See 69 FR 65127). The GSSA is comprised of a diverse group of fishing related businesses operating primarily in the State of New Jersey. The GSSA membership includes companies involved in all aspects of the fish and seafood industry, including commercial fishing, gear supply & dock operations, processing, importing/exporting, and restaurant/retail market operations.  
     
    Members of GSSA support ongoing efforts to minimize unintended accidental interactions with marine mammals. GSSA members do not condone unnecessary incidental injury or mortality of marine mammals. Many members of GSSA are veterans of the MMPA Take Reduction Team process and work via cooperative research initiatives to better understand and mitigate marine mammal and protected species interactions to the maximum extent feasible.
     
    GSSA strongly supports use of the 2002 stock assessment as the basis for the proposed management measures. Abundance estimates are the basis for determining PBR and it is essential the TRT operate using the best available scientific information. GSSA recognizes and appreciates the work of NMFS staff to produce this updated information in a timely fashion.    
     
    The GSSA also offers the following comments and recommendations on the Proposed Rule for management measures proposed for bottlenose dolphins in the waters and fisheries off New Jersey, Virginia, and North Carolina, and on the general gear marking requirements.
     
    NEW JERSEY (Summer Northern Migratory Management Unit)
       
    GSSA supports the measures contained in the Proposed Rule (at 65132). These proposed measures should be retained in the Final Rule in their current form as follows:
     
    From June 1 – October 31 of each year, the proposed regulations require persons fishing with medium mesh (greater than 5-inch to less than 7-inch) stretch mesh and large mesh (greater than or equal to 7-inch stretch mesh) anchored gillnets at night in state waters to remain within 0.5 nautical miles of the closest portion of each gear, and to remove all such gear and stow it on board the vessel before the vessel returns to port.     
     
    VIRGINIA STRIPED BASS FISHERY
     
     GSSA supports an appropriate exemption for the VA striped bass fishery during November and December. This fishery was not initially targeted for management measures during the BNDTRT deliberations and was addressed in the rule for purposes of turtle conservation, not dolphin protection.  Furthermore, since the fishery was not initially considered a problem the economic impact analyses (as a component of the EIS) does not contain information regarding the loss of this fishery.
     
    Clearly, the agency’s change in the definition of large mesh (from 8-inch to 7-inch) will eliminate this fishery and potentially increase bycatch -- a violation of National Standard 10 of the MSFCMA.  Additionally, the agency made this change in the proposed rule with no evidence or data supporting such a change.  There is no indication what the impacts will be for such a mesh size change and no observer information was provided to the TRT regarding the interactions of this fishery with sea turtles and how the proposed change will reduce the rate of interaction.
     
    Therefore, the GSSA strongly recommends the NMFS examine observed turtle interactions with this fishery (8-inch) for the past several years (not including strandings data that are influenced by turtles transported by warm core rings).  Based on this interaction analysis, the fishery should be subject to only the following two provisions which will allow for a viable fishery as reported by the State of Virginia:   
       
      •       Two nets, 1200 feet each;
      •       No night sets
     
    NORTH CAROLINA MANAGEMENT UNITS
       
    GSSA is opposed to the 300-foot prohibition and believes it was never the intent of the BNDTRT to restrict gillnet fishing in such a manner in North Carolina. GSSA believes the intent was to address the take of one dolphin in monofilament gear in the NC striped bass beach seine fishery and not unattended gillnets set from vessels in near shore waters.  Furthermore, since this was not the intent of the TRT or the NMFS the subsequent economic impact analyses did not consider the impacts of such a measure.  
     
    Therefore, GSSA supports the following language in place of the 300-foot prohibition:
     
    "All monofilament gear deployed from, fished from, or landed on the beach must be small mesh (less than 5-inches).  Such gear must be attended at all times, be actively fished, and the body and both ends of the net be landed on the beach. This prohibition does not apply to vessels launched from the beach that set their gear more than 100-yards from the beach."
     
    GSSA also supports the following provision for NC beach-based fisheries that is contained in the Proposed Rule. GSSA recommends a minimum delay in implementation of one-year be applied to this provision to allow sufficient time for affected crews to switch to the required webbing material:
     
      Multi-fiber or multi-filament webbing deployed from or fished or landed on the beach shall be constructed of webbing that is 4-inches or less stretched mesh.
     
    GENERAL GEAR MARKING REQUIREMENTS
     
    GSSA recommends the following changes to the Proposed Rule regarding marking requirements at 69 FR 65141. Additionally, GSSA recommends a one-year delay in the implementation of the 300-foot tag requirement to allow sufficient time for fishermen to locate the most economical and useful tag design.
       
      • Gear marking requirements should apply in regulated waters only;
      • Tags should not be required to include the names of individual fishermen or the mesh size of their gear;
      • Tags should contain a vessel identification number (State or USCG);
      • Tag definition should be broad enough to allow for maximum flexibility in the type of tag that is utilized by fishermen. The preamble of the Final Rule should reflect this intended flexibility;
      • Regarding the end flag/ball system, GSSA recommends using the current language in the Proposed Rule and adding the existing State marking requirements as long as the State requirements include an identification number and an 8-inch minimum diameter ball or flag, marked with at least two strips of reflective material at least two-inches in width and visible for 360 degrees.
 
    CONCURRENCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE MID-ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (MAFMC)
       
    The GSSA also agrees with the recent position taken by the MAFMC regarding the Bottlenose Dolphin TRT recommendations. GSSA supports the following Motion as passed by the MAFMC during their January meeting. Which was worded as follows:
     
      The Council supports exemptions for use of large mesh gillnets with tiedowns in the area between 2 and 3 nautical miles from the shore between Cape Hatteras, North Carolina and the Virginia border, and the use of gillnets in the Commonwealth of Virginia’s oceanic black drum fishery.
     
    On behalf of the members of the Garden State Seafood Association, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Rule for the Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan.
     
    Sincerely,
     
    Gregory P. DiDomenico
    Executive Director
    Garden State Seafood Association